Asrock H110M-HDS R3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDS R3.0  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180117
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 09 '18 at 15:04
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium G4560-$75
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46% Average
SC Int 66.5
SC Float 65.9
SC Mixed 72
54% 68.1 Pts
QC Int 216
QC Float 234
QC Mixed 219
51% 223 Pts
MC Int 264
MC Float 298
MC Mixed 280
42% 281 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$104
CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: BETA
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Lighting 64.9
Reflection 71.1
Parallax 72.6
21% 69.5 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 79.6
30% 72.2 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 31%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
533GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 79.4
Write 71.1
Mixed 61.4
53% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.34
79% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 56%
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50
466GB free
Firmware: GN00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 69.9
Write 72.4
Mixed 71.7
54% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.26
75% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 45%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$19
148GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 81
Write 76.8
Mixed 72.4
58% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.34
91% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 10.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H110M-HDS R3.0 Builds (Compare 403 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDS R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $230
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $365Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $67
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i5-8600K $250Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback