Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	16.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom 230 273 User benchmarks, average bench 19% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Memory 65.3 1-Core 4.2 2-Core 5.5 23% 25 Pts	4-Core 10.1 8-Core 9.7 1% 9.9 Pts	64-Core 9 1% 9 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Tcsunbow X3 60GB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0707A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 24 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 128 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 17 (A4) Unknown 100 100 574 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 21 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 49 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 9 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 823 (F2) Unknown 100 100 615 (F5) Unknown 100 100 917	16.3% Very poor	Read 120 Write 75.8 Mixed 94.2 21% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 1.51 22% 7.21 MB/s	DQ Read 17.2 DQ Write 21.5 DQ Mixed 1.63 6% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 72%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB 981 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 22GB free, PID 0109 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	7.78% Terrible	Read 16 Write 12.5 Mixed 12.5 17% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0.72 4K Mixed 0.59 53% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.78% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.19% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.77 GB/s	SC Read 0.8 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 0.9 3% 1.17 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.19% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16