Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240522
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateSep 13 '24 at 19:17
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X-$449
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 220
2-Core 458
129% 253 Pts
4-Core 914
8-Core 1,725
157% 1,320 Pts
64-Core 3,344
207% 3,344 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 126%
Great: 130%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$800
Gigabyte(1458 413C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 560.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 366
Parallax 390
133% 306 fps
MRender 477
Gravity 314
Splatting 222
263% 338 fps
Poor: 229%
This bench: 162%
Great: 265%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$150
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,928
Write 4382
Mixed 3,231
722% 3,180 MB/s
4K Read 65.9
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 94.7
302% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,787
DQ Write 1,364
DQ Mixed 1,610
1,194% 1,587 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2Y6000C30 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
208% Outstanding
MC Read 104
MC Write 63.8
MC Mixed 71.2
227% 79.5 GB/s
SC Read 47
SC Write 57.8
SC Mixed 53.4
151% 52.7 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 159%
This bench: 208%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 0P 2R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 31% 32 214 57 165 31.5" 2560 1369 GSM776F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $2,446
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback