Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B650M K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650M K  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '24 at 11:39
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User REU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G-$279
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 51.1
1-Core 180
2-Core 328
95% 186 Pts
4-Core 633
8-Core 1,092
104% 862 Pts
64-Core 1,715
106% 1,715 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.4.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 52.2
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 85.8
42% 53.2 fps
Gravity 75.3
Splatting 106
82% 90.6 fps
Poor: 19% Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
973GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1273 1238 1275 1000 768 685 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,371
Write 2,186
Mixed 1,754
SusWrite 1,040
412% 1,838 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 57.3
185% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,346
DQ Write 904
DQ Mixed 1,127
840% 1,126 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 266%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 47.4
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 46.8
112% 39 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.1
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 207%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 120 34.8" 1280 720 SAM72F2 Odyssey G85SB
Typical GA-B650M K Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 188%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650M K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $788
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback