Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 235%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics213% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory48 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '24 at 12:52
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$319
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 193
2-Core 352
116% 214 Pts
4-Core 686
8-Core 1,351
120% 1,018 Pts
64-Core 1,886
117% 1,886 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
213% Outstanding
Lighting 315
Reflection 298
Parallax 333
256% 315 fps
MRender 355
Gravity 262
Splatting 193
212% 270 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 213%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$150
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 825 1790 2138 1553 1295 1292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,114
Write 1,538
Mixed 1,700
SusWrite 1482
383% 1,709 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 63.2
204% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,383
DQ Write 883
DQ Mixed 1,258
904% 1,175 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 289%
Great: 587%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
703GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2299 2675 2687 2690 2059 1531 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,428
Write 2,768
Mixed 2,635
SusWrite 2,324
574% 2,539 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 55.5
183% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,426
DQ Write 1,097
DQ Mixed 1,292
958% 1,272 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 352%
Great: 477%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$46
1TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 172 175 175 177 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 168
Mixed 85
SusWrite 173
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
175% Outstanding
MC Read 71.9
MC Write 56.5
MC Mixed 61.6
181% 63.3 GB/s
SC Read 58
SC Write 58.9
SC Mixed 55.2
164% 57.4 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 175%
Great: 285%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 27" 1920 1009 SAM71DC LS27AG32x
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 271%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 277%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 144% - Outstanding Total price: $1,054
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $258Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback