Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83GS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 83GS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240312
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 29 '24 at 10:27
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-12450HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 53.9
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 198
60% 112 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 589
62% 495 Pts
64-Core 744
46% 744 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3D06) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 4.9
4% 5.63 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 6.3
5% 6.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GB
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1002V3LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 596 540 483 484 484 434 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,318
Write 1,339
Mixed 1,119
SusWrite 503
240% 1,070 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 26.8
146% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 771
DQ Write 538
DQ Mixed 696
508% 668 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 155%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 48
MC Mixed 41.5
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 18.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 109%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 60 15.5" 1536 864 AUO7EAD
Typical 83GS Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 83GS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback