Asus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231130
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJun 17 '24 at 04:41
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14400F-$200
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 72.8
1-Core 185
2-Core 363
107% 207 Pts
4-Core 680
8-Core 1,152
111% 916 Pts
64-Core 1,619
100% 1,619 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 113%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$390
Gigabyte(1458 404E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.5% Outstanding
Lighting 99.5
Reflection 213
Parallax 205
81% 173 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 156
Splatting 139
132% 165 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,540
Write 2,445
Mixed 1,808
504% 2,264 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 97.5
319% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,511
DQ Write 1,271
DQ Mixed 1,393
1,043% 1,392 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
244GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 486 486 483 404 285 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 476
Mixed 449
SusWrite 438
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 59
206% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 340
255% 340 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
121GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1690
Write 2,118
Mixed 1,806
420% 1,871 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 82
286% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,668
DQ Write 1,345
DQ Mixed 1,488
1,119% 1,501 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 167 171 166 170 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 168
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 168
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR5 5600 C36 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 52.3
MC Mixed 47.9
145% 50.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 24.9
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 131%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 100 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5C4D LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 225%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $933
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $164
Intel Core i5-12400F $117Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $393
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback