Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83ER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemLenovo 83ER  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230630
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 22:09
Run Duration340 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 48
1-Core 167
2-Core 272
85% 163 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 574
65% 510 Pts
64-Core 757
47% 757 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 384A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
9.97% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 12.4
9% 13.4 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 13.5
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.97%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GB
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1002V3LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1641 1644 1443 1073 640 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,791
Write 1,589
Mixed 1,435
SusWrite 1,087
331% 1,476 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 43
264% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 872
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 808
615% 830 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 252%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 23.4
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 16.5
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9051
Typical 83ER Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 83ER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback