Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro ANV16-41

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro ANV16-41  (all builds)
MotherboardHWK RZ_HKH
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240131
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 19:15
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 56.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 226
73% 136 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 723
66% 552 Pts
64-Core 951
59% 951 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 760M Graphics
Acer(1025 172C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.32
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 64.3
37% 42.2 fps
MRender 18.6
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 65
41% 47.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS001TEJ9X110N 1TB
654GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51070C30
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,413
Write 1,687
Mixed 1411
337% 1,504 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 30.1
133% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 799
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 633
440% 565 MB/s
Poor: 162% Great: 398%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 53
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 36.6
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 30.5
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 43.1
105% 36.6 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 118%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 8 165 16" 1920 1200 AUO80AD
Typical Nitro ANV16-41 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: Acer Nitro ANV16-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback