Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics89.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 01 '24 at 14:48
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$560
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 75.2
1-Core 215
2-Core 431
123% 241 Pts
4-Core 843
8-Core 1,599
145% 1,221 Pts
64-Core 3,622
224% 3,622 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Zotac(19DA 1527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.5% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 108
Parallax 109
91% 110 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 98.2
Splatting 90.6
86% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$150
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,371
Write 1,306
Mixed 868
263% 1182 MB/s
4K Read 69.6
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 89.4
291% 97.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,514
DQ Write 1,173
DQ Mixed 1,358
1,012% 1,348 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
Prograde CFexpress PG05.5 128GB
115GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 370
Write 399
Mixed 354
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 26.2
87% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 232
181% 248 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B5600Z40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
219% Outstanding
MC Read 137
MC Write 53.1
MC Mixed 65.2
243% 85 GB/s
SC Read 44.3
SC Write 58.5
SC Mixed 51.4
147% 51.4 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 219%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8025 BenQ PD3200U
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback