Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171212
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '18 at 00:21
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Memory 86.2 1-Core 129 2-Core 255 87% 157 Pts	4-Core 501 8-Core 743 77% 622 Pts	64-Core 742 46% 742 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing below potential (98^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)	56.9% Above average	Lighting 70.2 Reflection 70.5 Parallax 66 57% 68.9 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 66.1 Splatting 68.7 56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 110 30693945 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -56229711811982 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1522 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 103 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 30693945 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 30693945 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 30693945 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10394 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9831 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9831 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9655	46.5% Average	Read 188 Write 121 Mixed 135 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 99.6 4K Mixed 10.7 89% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 6.87 41% 94.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 52GB free Firmware: CC1G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 86 96967755 (03) Spinup time 99 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4434 (05) Reallocated sector count 82 82 769 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 211859890 (09) Power-on hours count 48 48 46197 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 3 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3124 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 25 25 75 (BE) vendor-specific 57 56 722927659 (C2) HDA temperature 43 44 55834574891 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 46 27 96967755 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -109178068618453 (F1) Unknown 100 253 193245496 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3073271803	53.3% Above average	Read 87.5 Write 98.4 Mixed 86.6 68% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.44 92% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 21.6 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 23.2 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $188Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,508x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	832x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	572x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	400x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	346x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	338x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	115x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	145x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $846

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16