Performance Results

Gaming 337%
Desktop 108%
Workstation 476%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics354% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive844% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D69
MotherboardMSI MEG X670E ACE (MS-7D69)  (all builds)
Memory54.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 10 '23 at 22:16
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$539
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 210
2-Core 261
108% 188 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 1,151
101% 860 Pts
64-Core 3,966
246% 3,966 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,764
Palit(1569 F296) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
354% Outstanding
Lighting 580
Reflection 495
Parallax 620
472% 565 fps
MRender 441
Gravity 493
Splatting 253
310% 396 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 354%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 2TB-$290
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7549 7526 6834 3724 3726 3735 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
844% Outstanding
Read 7,347
Write 6,212
Mixed 3,731
SusWrite 5,516
1,277% 5,701 MB/s
4K Read 79.1
4K Write 274
4K Mixed 122
421% 158 MB/s
DQ Read 2,056
DQ Write 1,691
DQ Mixed 1,889
1,410% 1,878 MB/s
Poor: 475%
This bench: 844%
Great: 926%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6000Z30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
206% Outstanding
MC Read 80.8
MC Write 73.3
MC Mixed 72.7
216% 75.6 GB/s
SC Read 58.5
SC Write 75.4
SC Mixed 63.9
188% 65.9 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 155%
This bench: 206%
Great: 300%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 240 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G8
Typical MEG X670E ACE (MS-7D69) Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 402%
Desktop 116%
Workstation 527%

Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E ACE (MS-7D69)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $2,453
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback