Asus MAXIMUS VI IMPACT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI IMPACT  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140129
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 16 '17 at 20:30
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-4770K-$474
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
77.9% Very good
SC Int 114
SC Float 117
SC Mixed 116
93% 116 Pts
QC Int 382
QC Float 393
QC Mixed 371
86% 382 Pts
MC Int 554
MC Float 594
MC Mixed 581
86% 576 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$175
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
68.1% Good
Lighting 203
Reflection 182
Parallax 198
62% 194 fps
MRender 151
Gravity 201
Splatting 156
72% 169 fps
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$199
79GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 503
Write 349
Mixed 354
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 26.3
137% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 44.2
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 28.6
54% 102 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88%
Great: 117%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$138
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 485
Write 341
Mixed 336
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 21
135% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 46.4
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 20.6
51% 100 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDT722525DLA380 250GB-$60
136GB free
Firmware: V44OA99A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 57.1
Write 55.5
Mixed 53.5
42% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.39
105% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 36%
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$76
11GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 43.4
Write 44.2
Mixed 43.2
33% 43.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.38
95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 16.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54%
Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS VI IMPACT Builds (Compare 473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI IMPACT - $330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,203
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $332Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i5-8600K $243Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback