HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx

Performance Results

Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 56%
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86D5
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '23 at 14:31
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 168
55% 100 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 429
45% 363 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
HP(103C 86D5) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.7.1
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
9.38% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 84.8
Parallax 16.3
10% 37.6 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 10.7
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.38%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC601 HFS256GD9TNG-L2A0A 256GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 279 281 276 279 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 668
Write 295
Mixed 349
SusWrite 277
88% 397 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 20.7
70% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 189
142% 191 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 180%
272GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 75 112 115 119 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 121
Write 118
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 105
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
157% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57% Above average
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx Builds (Compare 2,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 59%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback