Today's hottest deals

Jginyue H610M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemJginyue H610M-GAMING  (all builds)
MotherboardJGINYUE H610M-GAMING
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '23 at 15:35
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 70.1
1-Core 183
2-Core 318
101% 190 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 795
84% 670 Pts
64-Core 860
53% 860 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3430
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 5.7
4% 6.63 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 7
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GVL-512 512GB
458GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11457
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1521 1520 1385 1243 672 664 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,747
Write 1595
Mixed 1,427
SusWrite 1,168
334% 1,484 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 41.3
132% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 1,154
DQ Mixed 1,029
778% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 204%
This bench: 228%
Great: 339%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H610M-GAMING Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Jginyue H610M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $191
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback