Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 332%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 335%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics305% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 16:57
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$380
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 196
2-Core 387
120% 227 Pts
4-Core 697
8-Core 1,207
115% 952 Pts
64-Core 1,761
109% 1,761 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$720
Palit(1569 F296) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3180 MHz, MLim: 5700 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Lighting 458
Reflection 449
Parallax 478
374% 462 fps
MRender 568
Gravity 385
Splatting 277
320% 410 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 305%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2230 626 627 628 628 627 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 2,544
Write 2,384
Mixed 1,672
SusWrite 894
419% 1,874 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 92
321% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,715
DQ Write 1,496
DQ Mixed 1,557
1,180% 1,589 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 327%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
81GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,517
Write 1,846
Mixed 1,771
453% 2,045 MB/s
4K Read 64.3
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 81.9
279% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,786
DQ Write 1,576
DQ Mixed 1,664
1,252% 1,675 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
59GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 156 115 64 122 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 428
Write 415
Mixed 360
SusWrite 152
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 18.2
104% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 28.7
82% 170 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
286GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 91 91 91 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 87
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 90.3
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
124GB free
Firmware: PB4OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 61 59 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 54.6
Write 52.1
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 59.8
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 45%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 102 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 179
Write 159
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 101
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
220% Outstanding
MC Read 87.3
MC Write 71.4
MC Mixed 81.3
229% 80 GB/s
SC Read 72.7
SC Write 73.2
SC Mixed 66.6
202% 70.8 GB/s
Latency 52.1
77% 52.1 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 220%
Great: 207%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 417%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,348
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback