Asrock X670E Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsrock X670E Taichi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '23 at 21:34
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$220
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 76.6
1-Core 199
2-Core 353
111% 210 Pts
4-Core 667
8-Core 1,065
106% 866 Pts
64-Core 1,246
77% 1,246 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 101%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
Gigabyte(1458 2408) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.3.1
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 133
Parallax 301
118% 193 fps
MRender 257
Gravity 147
Splatting 200
164% 201 fps
Poor: 125%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.F.66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4889 4998 5024 5067 5075 5078 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 299% Great: 589%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F5-5600J2834F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 60.9
MC Write 58.6
MC Mixed 56.3
167% 58.6 GB/s
SC Read 52.9
SC Write 52.8
SC Mixed 51.8
150% 52.5 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 160%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0E84 SAMSUNG
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $315Nvidia RTX 3060 $350Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $194Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $140Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback