Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 18:50
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$190
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 205
2-Core 408
123% 235 Pts
4-Core 824
8-Core 1,459
138% 1,142 Pts
64-Core 2,430
150% 2,430 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 297 292 287 291 288 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 480
Mixed 413
SusWrite 309
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 49
163% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 339
256% 342 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$165
573GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2064 1945 1940 1933 1956 1936 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
414% Outstanding
Read 2,642
Write 2,442
Mixed 2383
SusWrite 1,962
530% 2,357 MB/s
4K Read 80.6
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 117
385% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,736
DQ Write 1,345
DQ Mixed 1,519
1,142% 1,533 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 414%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GVKC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 45.4
MC Write 45.3
MC Mixed 42.7
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 48.9
SC Mixed 36.9
109% 38.2 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 123%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 15,973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,069
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback