User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	GBT___ AWRDACPI
Motherboard	Gigabyte C19-MCP04
Memory	1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060313
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '17 at 12:13
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.60GHz 127 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Memory 70.7 1-Core 29.2 2-Core 35 34% 45 Pts	4-Core 40.6 8-Core 40.7 5% 40.7 Pts	64-Core 41.2 2% 41.2 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7300 LE 202 User benchmarks, average bench 0% MSI(1462 0345) 128MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.22% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.54 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.35 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.22% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Maxtor 6 Y160P0 164GB 404 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: YAR41BW0 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 203 203 17497 (04) Start/Stop count 252 252 2035 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 2 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 250 241 38855 (09) Power-on hours count 232 232 59913 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 248 248 2097 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 1138 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 151 73 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 251 34 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 252 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 196 193 0 (63) Unknown 253 253 0 (64) Unknown 253 253 0 (65) Unknown 253 253 0	31.7% Below average	Read 53.9 Write 56.4 Mixed 34.2 36% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.38 96% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 32%
Mass Storage Device 160GB 951 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 119GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 32.7 Mixed 11.4 31% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.23 43% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 512, 512, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	13.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)