Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X (all builds)
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180829
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '22 at 21:45
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8500-$169 43,089 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 74.5 1-Core 62.5 2-Core 125 53% 87.2 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 309 36% 281 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$279 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% MSI(1462 3976); msi gaming x CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.98 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.6% Outstanding	Lighting 129 Reflection 114 Parallax 120 105% 121 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 102 Splatting 82.1 86% 108 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 106%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB 1,156 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2007 Write 1558 Mixed 1,347 363% 1,637 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 47.1 149% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 579 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 419 318% 435 MB/s
Poor: 225% Great: 381%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB 365 User benchmarks, average bench 281% 12GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,298 Write 1,739 Mixed 1,389 400% 1,809 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 68.3 4K Mixed 56.6 180% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 661 DQ Write 470 DQ Mixed 560 420% 564 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 333%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70.8% Very good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 23.8 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 16.4 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 91.5 44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 11,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $227

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,971x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	2,728x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,634x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	934x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	871x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	770x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	453x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	443x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	345x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	481x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	400x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	337x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 117% - Outstanding

Total price: $777

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16