Lenovo 20F5S1F700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20F5S1F700  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20F5S1F700
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateNov 21 '22 at 15:25
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Memory 14
1-Core 54.5
2-Core 67.9
25% 45.5 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 129
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 504A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
2-power SSD2041A 120GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 299
Write 266
Mixed 101
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 4.5
25% 8.93 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 73
DQ Mixed 0.2
27% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 2.7
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 0.9
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 368
11% 368 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20F5S1F700 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20F5S1F700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback