MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 50%
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '22 at 18:26
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 51.9
2-Core 87.9
46% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 198
23% 178 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Asus(1043 026A) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.95% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 9.1
9% 10.6 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 6
Splatting 8
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.95%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 232 231 243 253 243 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.9% Good
Read 278
Write 233
Mixed 231
SusWrite 241
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 21.7
70% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 286
216% 292 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$19
19GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 113 105 117 100 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 113
Write 99.6
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 112
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB88B7N-DI 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-P33 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 5,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 23%
Desktop 72%
Workstation 18%

Motherboard: MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817) - $73

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback