PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Maximus IV GENE-Z (all builds) |
Memory | 9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121109 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 01 '17 at 10:50 |
Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 40% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E31230
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
61.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
75.5%
Very good
|
||||
50.5%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
44.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 180x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 102x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 32x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 34x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 26x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $666 |