PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 16.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140225 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 31 '17 at 11:21 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | THA-User |
Background CPU | 93% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium G645T
Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G645T @ 2.50GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
|
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 387.92
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
12.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
T-64 63GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T170317d Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
|||
26.4%
Poor
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 251x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 223x |
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 212x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 452x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 219x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 145x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $287 |