Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3245 560 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Memory 63.9 1-Core 80.9 2-Core 136 55% 93.6 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 219 30% 223 Pts	64-Core 226 14% 226 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15 52,547 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11D7) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.66% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 2.5 3% 2.43 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.7 2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.66% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GB 4,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT05L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 81 28 29 62 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 413 Write 34.3 Mixed 47.4 SusWrite 59.8 30% 139 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 27.7 4K Mixed 13.2 56% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 38.7 DQ Mixed 48.8 53% 93.3 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 6.9 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	109x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	85x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	66x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	17x
M378B5773CH0-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 50%, 789 samples	8x
M378B5773CH0-CK0 4x2GBSamsungBench 57%, 306 samples	7x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16