Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JP
Memory15.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '22 at 14:56
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 48%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 48.2
1-Core 55.8
2-Core 100
40% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 219
23% 186 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Asus(1043 1F0F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 18
Parallax 10.1
7% 12.3 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 0.2
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.24%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6512G 512GB
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1006A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1033 1234 1208 1283 1225 1045 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 794
Write 600
Mixed 553
SusWrite 1,171
176% 779 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 19
95% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 472
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 409
310% 419 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 150%
Great: 270%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
771GB free
Firmware: JU0C2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 142 126 134 134 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 139
Write 138
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 134
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
229% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 859B CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 14.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback