Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING II (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201208
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '22 at 17:05
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	74%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$97 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 74.6 2-Core 126 56% 92 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 491 43% 367 Pts	64-Core 629 39% 629 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367A) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Lighting 66.9 Reflection 85.4 Parallax 0.1 54% 50.8 fps	MRender 69.3 Gravity 67.5 Splatting 58 52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB 30,897 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: UI450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 8.5 27 43 74 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 378 Write 231 Mixed 239 SusWrite 69.9 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 24.5 4K Mixed 14.7 49% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 43.7 DQ Write 67.2 DQ Mixed 38.7 34% 49.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 52%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 28GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 220 206 212 204 204 MB/s Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51% Above average	Read 224 Write 95 Mixed 85 SusWrite 208 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 21.4 4K Mixed 23.3 60% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 117 117% 189 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 558GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 50 50 63 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	20.9% Poor	Read 18.8 Write 45.3 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 54.1 25% 34.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 24.5 MC Mixed 28.3 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 17.4 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 88.6 45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	253x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	244x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	176x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	434x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	294x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	135x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $581

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16