Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka) 31,243 User benchmarks, average bench 42% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Memory 47.9 1-Core 57.2 2-Core 101 40% 68.6 Pts	4-Core 54.5 8-Core 140 11% 97.2 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 22,117 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.01% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 6.6 Parallax 9.3 0% 5.4 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 7.2 6% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.01% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 45 25 32 26 32 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.5% Poor	Read 181 Write 97.8 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 36.9 21% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 53 4K Mixed 7.4 43% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 95.5 DQ Mixed 7.3 30% 68 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 2x8GB 1,126 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	22.3% Poor	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 7.3 23% 8.03 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 5.7 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	59x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	51x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	40x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16