| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20201014 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 30 '22 at 01:39 |
| Run Duration | 205 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84.1%
Excellent
|
88% 162 Pts
|
83% 686 Pts
|
82% 1,330 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
63.6%
Good
|
68% 74.8 fps
|
55% 66.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 79 16 17 80 MB/s
|
51.9%
Above average
|
33% 148 MB/s
|
108% 40.5 MB/s
|
112% 182 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
25GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 149 160 155 148 149 MB/s
|
89%
Excellent
|
97% 132 MB/s
|
149% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
69.5%
Good
|
72% 25 GB/s
|
59% 20.6 GB/s
|
45% 89.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,034 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,461x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,304x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,006x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 949x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 734x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 653x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 103% - Outstanding | Total price: $322 |