MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 20 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 12:46
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 227
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 885
79% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,204
74% 1,204 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.7% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 90.9
55% 74 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 46.9
49% 61.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1076 859 872 865 865 870 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2,594
Write 2,401
Mixed 1863
SusWrite 901
434% 1,940 MB/s
4K Read 67.5
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 89.2
295% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 945
DQ Write 737
DQ Mixed 805
612% 829 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 288%
Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
290GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 478 478 483 483 483 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 393
Write 412
Mixed 381
SusWrite 478
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 57.5
187% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
805GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 479 478 483 483 484 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 485
Mixed 463
SusWrite 480
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 54.7
180% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
369GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 104 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 115
Write 102
Mixed 84
SusWrite 102
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 112%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 157 159 160 159 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 150
Mixed 106
SusWrite 157
108% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3466 MHz clocked @ 1733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 46.6
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 34
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 30.7
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $608
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback