| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150811 |
| Uptime | 2.9 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 06 '22 at 18:51 |
| Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 81% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
54.3%
Above average
|
50% 85.1 Pts
|
25% 190 Pts
|
15% 249 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.1%
Above average
|
54% 79.1 fps
|
51% 61.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HFS128G32MND-2200A 128GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 93 96 86 96 87 MB/s
|
38.8%
Below average
|
37% 167 MB/s
|
50% 18.3 MB/s
|
112% 159 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
647GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 146 142 150 155 152 MB/s
|
80.2%
Excellent
|
84% 117 MB/s
|
106% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
39%
Below average
|
37% 13 GB/s
|
37% 13 GB/s
|
47% 84.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H81M-S2PV Builds (Compare 2,133 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV - $78
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 230x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 191x |
| Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 183x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 228x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 197x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 118x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $315 |