Today's hottest deals

Xenta 1257714

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics94.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemXenta 1257714  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star H510M PRO (MS-7D22)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 16:33
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 166
2-Core 329
101% 191 Pts
4-Core 656
8-Core 1,025
104% 840 Pts
64-Core 1,130
70% 1,130 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Asus(1043 8732) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 131
Parallax 111
98% 121 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 100
Splatting 96.3
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP500GM30021 500GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STPSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 663 510 477 445 441 364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 1,576
Mixed 563
SusWrite 483
176% 773 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 38.1
141% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 913
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 460
445% 707 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 129%
Great: 272%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GC3200C16K2E 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 14.9
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1257714 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

System: Xenta 1257714

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 152% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback