| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160308 |
| Uptime | 6.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 26 '22 at 17:53 |
| Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55%
Above average
|
67% 115 Pts
|
23% 168 Pts
|
10% 168 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.5%
Poor
|
24% 30.4 fps
|
23% 28.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 91 104 108 105 MB/s
|
50.8%
Above average
|
59% 79.9 MB/s
|
181% 1.33 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD1200JS-00MHB0 120GB
18GB free
Firmware: 2E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 38 38 37 MB/s
|
21.2%
Poor
|
26% 34.6 MB/s
|
145% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
62.4%
Good
|
62% 21.9 GB/s
|
56% 19.5 GB/s
|
51% 79 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,908 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,112x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 637x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 553x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 838x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 467x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 366x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |