Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro X9SCL/X9SCM  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SCL/X9SCM
Memory23.1 GB free of 32.0078 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120917
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateOct 14 '17 at 15:35
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31225
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 167
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 327
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
MSI(1462 8094) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 2.12
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.25 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 421
Write 167
Mixed 270
63% 286 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 4.85
34% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 39.7
DQ Write 14.4
DQ Mixed 4.7
9% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 103%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 129
Write 135
Mixed 130
99% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.19
93% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 127
Write 119
Mixed 116
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.19
97% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 129
Write 129
Mixed 123
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.29
100% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 84%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62
931GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 143
Write 140
Mixed 143
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.58
4K Mixed 0.25
113% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 87%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62
931GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
75% Very good
Read 128
Write 133
Mixed 126
97% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.65
4K Mixed 0.26
113% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75%
Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
160GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 61.1
Write 60
Mixed 54.2
44% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.18
54% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 Kingston 9965525-116.A00LF 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 Kingston 9965525-116.A00LF Winbond 25X/Q Series 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9SCL/X9SCM Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $74
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback