Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 12:19
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 78.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 274
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 842
83% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 8827) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 172
Parallax 166
147% 173 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 137
Splatting 117
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 694 567 436 439 356 319 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,024
Write 1,214
Mixed 695
SusWrite 469
191% 850 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 44.5
169% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,251
DQ Write 382
DQ Mixed 216
316% 616 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 157%
Great: 291%
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35
31GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 141 141 140 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 157
Mixed 96
SusWrite 140
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.6
341% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 111%
Toshiba MQ04ABD200 2TB
22GB free
Firmware: JT000U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 120 112 113 111 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 130
Write 130
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 118
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
232% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 80%
Toshiba MK2556GSY 250GB
140GB free
Firmware: LH003C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 91 93 91 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 106
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 91.3
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
306GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 75 79 66 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 92
Write 107
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 71.4
65% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
184% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 67%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 146 149 148 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 133
Write 140
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 147
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.8
183% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 60.9
MC Mixed 28
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 12
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback