PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel H55 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141225 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 02 '22 at 23:05 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
|
43.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 190 209 209 233 231 MB/s
|
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Ultra Slim GD 1TB
607GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 18 17 MB/s
|
12.8%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 3TB
724GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 17 MB/s
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
32.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $100Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 639x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 241x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 217x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 441x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 298x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 176x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $100 |