| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160919 |
| Uptime | 5.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 21 '22 at 01:43 |
| Run Duration | 209 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.1%
Good
|
78% 133 Pts
|
40% 332 Pts
|
25% 402 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.7%
Above average
|
55% 70.2 fps
|
54% 66.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
140GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 806 797 855 853 830 769 MB/s
|
188%
Outstanding
|
215% 956 MB/s
|
161% 58.2 MB/s
|
759% 1,006 MB/s
|
|
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 107 116 114 118 MB/s
|
45.1%
Average
|
64% 87.7 MB/s
|
179% 1.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.3%
Good
|
69% 24.1 GB/s
|
56% 19.5 GB/s
|
62% 64 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,113 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 392x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 381x |
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 352x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 399x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 346x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 217x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $234 |