PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 40.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
System | HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx (all builds) |
Motherboard | HP 8308 |
Memory | 3.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170703 |
Uptime | 16 Days |
Run Date | Jun 04 '22 at 13:10 |
Run Duration | 189 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 47% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
64.9%
Good
|
69% 117 Pts
|
46% 362 Pts
|
33% 486 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$230
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.6%
Average
|
40% 48.5 fps
|
41% 51.6 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 169 134 130 127 123 MB/s
|
149%
Outstanding
|
149% 676 MB/s
|
164% 57.5 MB/s
|
551% 774 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$103
781GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 413 398 378 434 399 MB/s
|
98.9%
Outstanding
|
88% 389 MB/s
|
136% 47.3 MB/s
|
263% 351 MB/s
|
![]() Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
450GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 153 152 152 149 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
87% 120 MB/s
|
140% 1.07 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
61.1%
Good
|
65% 22.8 GB/s
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
47% 85.4 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 7 | 5 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | ACR075B XV270 V |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $148Bench 63%, 74,026 samples | 954x |
Core i7-7700Intel $280Bench 79%, 248,935 samples | 904x |
Core i5-7400Intel $165Bench 71%, 244,589 samples | 502x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $138Bench 80%, 1,277,123 samples | 694x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $230Bench 53%, 586,807 samples | 616x |
Radeon RX 580AMDBench 42%, 6,731 samples | 348x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 96% - Outstanding | Total price: $334 |