HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8308
Memory3.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170703
Uptime16 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 13:10
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 174
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 441
46% 362 Pts
64-Core 486
33% 486 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$230
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.6% Average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 49
Parallax 46.6
40% 48.5 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 49.1
Splatting 46
41% 51.6 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 169 134 130 127 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,324
Write 721
Mixed 510
SusWrite 150
149% 676 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 48
164% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 886
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 690
551% 774 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 149%
Great: 334%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$103
781GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 413 398 378 434 399 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 404
Write 388
Mixed 364
SusWrite 400
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 41.8
136% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 349
263% 351 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 138%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
450GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 153 152 152 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 152
Write 145
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 149
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 20.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 27" 1280 720 ACR075B XV270 V
Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 3,547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $334
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $446Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3050 $292Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $378Nvidia RTX 3070 $536Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $62SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback