Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 12:44
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980XE-$1,067
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 83.1
1-Core 135
2-Core 269
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 1069
96% 807 Pts
64-Core 3,097
192% 3,097 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.5% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 134
Parallax 122
95% 124 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 106
Splatting 115
105% 131 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,720
Write 2,708
Mixed 1,886
543% 2,438 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 86.9
311% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 392
373% 599 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
32GB free
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 363 362 363 360 363 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 346
Mixed 298
SusWrite 362
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 43.6
176% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 132
156% 271 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
276GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1108 868 863 866 867 863 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,598
Write 2168
Mixed 1,800
SusWrite 906
417% 1,868 MB/s
4K Read 71.8
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 99.8
336% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1300
DQ Write 980
DQ Mixed 1,127
846% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 314%
Great: 355%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
18GB free
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 133 135 132 124 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 512
Write 284
Mixed 275
SusWrite 134
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 30.7
142% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 98.4
DQ Mixed 95.9
94% 153 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
565GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 98 98 99 100 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 139
Write 111
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 97.4
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8
14GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 9.3 5.4 3 8.8 9.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 162
Write 58.5
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 14.7
81% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.8
165% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 49.3
MC Write 69.2
MC Mixed 44.3
155% 54.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 11.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 133%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 704 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $536
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback