Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4310M 6,256 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 94.6 2-Core 163 70% 116 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 248 33% 248 Pts	64-Core 242 15% 242 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 05BD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	3.36% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 6.9 3% 4.3 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 5.2 4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.36% Great: 3%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB 12,396 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 389 Write 391 Mixed 233 75% 338 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 66.2 4K Mixed 27.3 100% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 145 162% 275 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 118%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB 2,045 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 3GB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 148 Write 149 Mixed 19.9 123% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-082.A00LF 2x8GB 242 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 17.6 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 19.5 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	1,722x
Radeon HD 8690MAMDBench 4%, 122 samples	11x
Radeon HD 8600MAMDBench 5%, 1,068 samples	7x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	155x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	76x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	72x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16