PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 16.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C09 |
Motherboard | MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds) |
Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200106 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 01 '22 at 00:28 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 93 67 74 70 93 MB/s
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
41.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2,313x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,503x |
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 291x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 635x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 463x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 357x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $359 |