HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140422
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '22 at 13:29
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 160
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 331
42% 317 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1083) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1161 MHz, MLim: 542 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.01% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 10.4
7% 8.6 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.01%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 0 309 271 120 302 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 336
Write 284
Mixed 218
SusWrite 204
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 20.4
76% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 67.8
126% 251 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 110%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$29
857GB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.3 5.6 5.6 4.4 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 124
Write 15.7
Mixed 2
SusWrite 5.6
26% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.5
134% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 90%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
235GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 129 133 134 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 97.4
Write 74.2
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 132
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.5
232% 3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 101%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
263GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 84 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 73
Write 87.7
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 84.7
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 59%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.5 1.4 3.1 0.8 2.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
7.09% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 6.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 2.2
10% 8.25 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
82% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.09%
Great: 11%
Flash USB Disk 17TB
15.5TB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 33 36 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 35.4
Write 30
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 34.9
46% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 12.6
894% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 18.6
DQ Mixed 18.9
1,347% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-023.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback