Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Memory 49 1-Core 23 2-Core 45.9 27% 39.3 Pts	4-Core 45.7 8-Core 45.7 6% 45.7 Pts	64-Core 45.6 3% 45.6 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WDS120G2G0B- 120GB 548 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: UI510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 27 82 48 70 80 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 86%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 773GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 129 132 131 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	78% Very good	Read 140 Write 129 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 130 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.5 216% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6CFR6A-PB 1x4GB 5,898 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 5.8 19% 6.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	84x
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	68x
Celeron N3000IntelBench 23%, 201 samples	6x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	166x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	3x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6P1 1x4GBMicronBench 22%, 2,778 samples	85x
HMT451S6CFR6A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 20%, 5,898 samples	49x
HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 1x2GBHynixBench 15%, 2,027 samples	15x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16