Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1900 6,116 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	Memory 34 1-Core 21.9 2-Core 43.1 21% 33 Pts	4-Core 84.6 8-Core 82.6 11% 83.6 Pts	64-Core 85.4 5% 85.4 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1297 4019) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.76% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.7 1% 0.83 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.76% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 190 179 196 210 229 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.2% Below average	Read 118 Write 135 Mixed 212 SusWrite 189 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 34.1 4K Mixed 13 52% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 91.7 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 74.5 68% 103 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1333 C9 1x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 6.7 21% 7.23 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 232 17% 232 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J1900IntelBench 34%, 6,116 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	2x

SSD
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	1x
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GBKingstonBench 28%, 2,625 samples	1x
F3 DDR3 1333 C9 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 22%, 50 samples	1x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $190

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16