| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME B365M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191010 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 26 '22 at 15:11 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | BEL-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
84% 149 Pts
|
72% 572 Pts
|
41% 668 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.5%
Below average
|
42% 47.9 fps
|
36% 44 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 24 24 22 23 22 MB/s
|
||||
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
497GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 23 23 22 30 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.6%
Very good
|
71% 24.9 GB/s
|
59% 20.8 GB/s
|
60% 66.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME B365M-A Builds (Compare 5,283 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME B365M-A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,617x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 477x |
| Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 417x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 354x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 336x |
| RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 275x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $444 |