To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191029
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '22 at 07:54
Run Duration	340 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	85%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77 3,540 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 79.4 1-Core 32.5 2-Core 68.4 42% 60.1 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 312 29% 243 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% MSI(1462 2610) 1GB CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.49% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 11.9 0% 9.17 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.5 4% 5.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 1.49% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 249GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR054 SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 18 59 42 90 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 422 Write 302 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 99.4 46% 210 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 0.5 16% 6.13 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 26.8 52% 104 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 302GB free Firmware: 3202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 13 16 14 12 13 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.3% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 8.2 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 81.6 49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	616x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	102x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16