Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P6X58D-E (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110324
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '17 at 06:26
Run Duration	331 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 95.3 1-Core 75.2 2-Core 145 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 346 38% 297 Pts	64-Core 344 21% 344 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 2983) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.5% Average	Lighting 60.8 Reflection 59 Parallax 55.1 50% 58.3 fps	MRender 58.9 Gravity 54.1 Splatting 48.7 44% 53.9 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 82GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5182 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1039 (B1) Unknown 98 98 36 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 53 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 200 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13669575824	45.1% Average	Read 200 Write 184 Mixed 169 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 15.9 81% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 31.7 DQ Write 50.3 DQ Mixed 18 20% 33.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 6191514 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12824772346168 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 167 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 108 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 24 31 68721508376 (C2) HDA temperature 24 31 68721508376 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 6191514 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 6191514 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 6191514 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98784247808 (E9) Unknown 0 0 848 (EA) Unknown 0 0 750 (F1) Unknown 0 0 750 (F2) Unknown 0 0 861 (F4) Unknown 100 100 720899	45.3% Average	Read 184 Write 199 Mixed 176 42% 186 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 11.3 81% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 82.6 DQ Mixed 12.2 22% 40.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 131 131 21494104349 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 788 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2006 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 546 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 789 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 789 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 206159347744 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	94.5% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 160 Mixed 162 123% 164 MB/s	4K Read 1.06 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.23 100% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 108%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB 10,272 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 75GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 83 81 5339 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 3023 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 16449 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2278 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1239 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 56 188979150877 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 95 95 2774 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 8 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3101	66.7% Good	Read 125 Write 107 Mixed 56.2 71% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 2.38 4K Mixed 0.34 97% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 77%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB 2,264 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 281GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 93.7 Write 95.3 Mixed 76.4 113% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.2 67% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.76% Terrible	Read 21.6 Write 10.7 Mixed 7.99 15% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.43 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.02 21% 1.82 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.76% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.6% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 11.4 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.4 34% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 56.1 71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	496x
Core i7 930Intel $249Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	197x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	145x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	74x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	74x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	47x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	231x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	221x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	132x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16