Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130 10,423 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Memory 47.3 1-Core 14.5 2-Core 28.1 22% 30 Pts	4-Core 45.9 8-Core 70.8 7% 58.4 Pts	64-Core 70.1 4% 70.1 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 128GB 663 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 96 79 64 116 59 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.5% Poor	Read 61.5 Write 124 Mixed 114 SusWrite 89 22% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 10.9 36% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 33.6 DQ Mixed 61.4 54% 84.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 68%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87 21,339 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 641GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 120 122 122 121 122 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 126 Write 126 Mixed 71.6 SusWrite 122 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB 6,386 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.83 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 171 23% 171 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	227x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	170x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	16x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	12x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16