Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 20 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 18:43
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 202
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 452
60% 452 Pts
64-Core 646
40% 646 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.2% Average
Lighting 55.2
Reflection 62.8
Parallax 88.9
45% 69 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 47.2
48% 60.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$107
825GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 470 471 475 467 446 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 464
Mixed 409
SusWrite 463
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 38.2
139% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.4
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 48.5
48% 74 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 128%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
535GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 808 91 692 225 318 482 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1660
Write 1,532
Mixed 1,122
SusWrite 436
265% 1,188 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 72.5
238% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 60.8
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 86.5
75% 107 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 173%
Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback