PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B61 |
Motherboard | MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61) (all builds) |
Memory | 9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180307 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 03 '22 at 19:22 |
Run Duration | 238 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
|
32.8%
Below average
|
|||
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
MSI(1462 7B61) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
|
6.16%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI190000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 13 12 9.5 7 17 MB/s
|
30.2%
Below average
|
|||
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
27GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 3.4 14 80 55 20 MB/s
|
37.6%
Below average
|
|||
Fujitsu MHV2160BT PL 160GB
19GB free
Firmware: 00000050
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
|
10.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Toshiba MK2552GSX 250GB-$47
26GB free
Firmware: LV011C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
62%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 2,352x |
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 1,787x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 764x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 717x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 637x |
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples | 507x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $834 |